azspot:

why Occupy Wall Street exists, reason #1,734

cognitivedissonance:

Police pen up and mace female “Occupy Wall Street” protesters

In a disturbing scene from today’s “Occupy Wall Street” protests, a group of peaceful female protesters were rounded up in an orange-colored mesh pen by police and subsequently sprayed with mace without any provocation.

In spite of multiple reported incidents of possible police violence, major media outlets seem to be content to let the protests go by completely unreported, following the same “who-cares” attitude they have taken toward recent revelations that the NYPD has violated the Constitutional rights of American citizens by spying on them as possible terrorists and enemies of the state despite a complete absence of evidence of any crimes.

This is absolutely disturbing. Penning people up to mace them is police brutality. Period. What will it take to get the mainstream media to pay attention? If you follow the #OccupyWallStreet, you’ll find out that at least 80 were arrested today. AP and Wall Street Journal mentioned the arrests briefly today. 

(via soupsoup)

laurasthinkingwithportals:

A young man of color arrested in Union Square earlier today doing literally nothing but crossing the street.

I am fucking shaking with anger. This video shows Union Square earlier today. Clearly there is a protest but the area immediately surrounding the guy with the camera is just observers and people milling around. Watch the guy in the red shirt. From the vimeo link:

As you can see at around 0:30, a young man in a red shirt, Glenn Daniels Jr, is walking near the sidewalk with hundreds of other protestors. The crowd was attempting to cross the street to continue the march south down Broadway from Union Square. Daniels is peacefully walking with a water bottle, not committing any crime. At 0:35 he is approached by an NYPD officer and pushed towards the sidewalk. At 0:38 a senior police officer in a white shirt quickly approaches and grabs Daniels and another young man with a beard and backpack. The lighter skinned man is let go, but Daniels is arrested. The remainder of the video shows NYPD officers cuffing and detaining Daniels.

Unbefuckinglievable. He’s doing fucking nothing.

(Source: lau-ra-sau-rus, via soupsoup)

photographyprison:

Prison Beauty Pagent 
Reuters has 16 images from the recent ‘Miss Penitentiary Contest’ at the Women’s Prison of Brasilia in Brazil, August 9, 2011.
I’ve seen these events at Columbian and Russian women’s prisons before.
Photo Credit: Ueslei Marcelino

photographyprison:

Prison Beauty Pagent

Reuters has 16 images from the recent ‘Miss Penitentiary Contest’ at the Women’s Prison of Brasilia in Brazil, August 9, 2011.

I’ve seen these events at Columbian and Russian women’s prisons before.

Photo Credit: Ueslei Marcelino

loladelphia:

Drivers on the Vine Street Expressway (I-676) were treated to something a little outside of the norm today. The banners dropped from the overpasses served the purpose of showing solidarity and support for the 6600-plus prisoners in California who are currently on a hunger strike to protest conditions in California prisons. According to the Philly Independent Media Center, the banners are done to particularly protest the conditions in solitary confinement that include: 
• 23-hour lockdown behind a solid steel door
• isolation from human interaction
• frequent threat and occurrence of physical torture via prolonged placement in punitive restraint devices
• assault, often with chemical weapons
• mental torture via sensory deprivation and disorienting temperature and light fluctuations, along with rampant psychological neglect
• sexual intimidation and assault.
Do prisons serve a useful purpose in helping reform criminals and provide punishment for their crimes, or are they a place where criminals simply get tortured and learn how to become better criminals? Where do you stand on the issue? Do you support the idea of Philadelphia showing solidarity with the striking CA prisoners?

loladelphia:

Drivers on the Vine Street Expressway (I-676) were treated to something a little outside of the norm today. The banners dropped from the overpasses served the purpose of showing solidarity and support for the 6600-plus prisoners in California who are currently on a hunger strike to protest conditions in California prisons. According to the Philly Independent Media Center, the banners are done to particularly protest the conditions in solitary confinement that include: 

  • • 23-hour lockdown behind a solid steel door
  • • isolation from human interaction
  • • frequent threat and occurrence of physical torture via prolonged placement in punitive restraint devices
  • • assault, often with chemical weapons
  • • mental torture via sensory deprivation and disorienting temperature and light fluctuations, along with rampant psychological neglect
  • • sexual intimidation and assault.

Do prisons serve a useful purpose in helping reform criminals and provide punishment for their crimes, or are they a place where criminals simply get tortured and learn how to become better criminals? Where do you stand on the issue? Do you support the idea of Philadelphia showing solidarity with the striking CA prisoners?

Laws named after crime victims and dead people are usually a bad idea. They play more to emotion than reason. But they’re disturbingly predictable, especially when they come after the death of a child. So it’s really no surprise that activist Michelle Crowder is now pushing “Caylee’s Law,” a proposed federal bill that would charge parents with a felony if they fail to report a missing child within 24 hours, or if they fail to report the death of a child within an hour. What’s surprising is just how quickly the Change.org petition for Caylee’s Law has gone viral. As of this writing it has more than 700,000 signatures, and is now the most successful campaign in the site’s history. For reasons of constitutionality and practicality, it seems unlikely that Caylee’s Law will ever be realized at the federal level. But according to the AP, at least sixteen state legislatures are now considering some version of the law. That’s troubling.

psydoctor8:

inothernews:

Cornelius Dupree Jr., center, celebrated the overturn of his conviction  in Dallas Tuesday. He served 30 years for rape and robbery before DNA  evidence helped clear him. Mr. Dupree could have been paroled, but he  refused to admit guilt, a necessary step. (Photo: Mike Fuentes / AP via the Wall St. Journal)

“Cornelius Dupree spent the prime of his life behind bars because of  mistaken identification that probably would have been avoided if  the  best practices now used in Dallas had been employed,” said Barry Scheck,  Co-Director of the Innocence Project, which is affiliated with Cardozo  School of Law. “Yet most counties in Texas do not have these best  practices in place. This must be remedied in the next legislative  session by the adoption of an eyewitness identification reform bill that  had the votes needed for passage last session but not enough time to  get enacted. Let us never forget that, as in the heartbreaking case of  Cornelius Dupree, a staggering 75% of wrongful convictions of people  later cleared by DNA evidence resulted from misidentifications.” via the Innocence Project. Bold mine.
There is enormous amounts of research surrounding the unreliability of eye witnesses.  Outrageous that with a stat that high, this is an issue.

psydoctor8:

inothernews:

Cornelius Dupree Jr., center, celebrated the overturn of his conviction in Dallas Tuesday. He served 30 years for rape and robbery before DNA evidence helped clear him. Mr. Dupree could have been paroled, but he refused to admit guilt, a necessary step. (Photo: Mike Fuentes / AP via the Wall St. Journal)

“Cornelius Dupree spent the prime of his life behind bars because of mistaken identification that probably would have been avoided if  the best practices now used in Dallas had been employed,” said Barry Scheck, Co-Director of the Innocence Project, which is affiliated with Cardozo School of Law. “Yet most counties in Texas do not have these best practices in place. This must be remedied in the next legislative session by the adoption of an eyewitness identification reform bill that had the votes needed for passage last session but not enough time to get enacted. Let us never forget that, as in the heartbreaking case of Cornelius Dupree, a staggering 75% of wrongful convictions of people later cleared by DNA evidence resulted from misidentifications.” via the Innocence Project. Bold mine.

There is enormous amounts of research surrounding the unreliability of eye witnesses.  Outrageous that with a stat that high, this is an issue.

Generally speaking, jurors with above-average or high IQs are potentially more beneficial to defendants. This is not due to the inherent merit of one side’s case over the other; rather, it is reflective of the impact of cognitive deficiencies on decision-making skills. Also, low IQ jurors are more likely to rely on their emotions as opposed to trying to analyze a complicated or confusing fact pattern, thus arguments that generate strong negative emotions, such as fear or anger, are more likely to persuade them. Finally, low IQ jurors with a critical thinking skill deficit may depend more on first impressions to make decisions than their tenuous analytical skills, so they are less likely to carefully consider both sides and more likely to be persuaded by the first arguments they hear.

Do We Need Einsteins in the Jury Box? The Role and Impact of Juror IQ. (via)

(Source: psydoctor8)

other news is designed by manasto jones.